Jump to navigation

  •  
  •  
  •  

  • Courses
  • Resources
  • Case study
  • Showcase
  • Tools
  • Gallery
  • Videos

Search form

Animation Design Communication Design Design Fundamentals Interaction Design Product Design Tools for Design Open Design
Home / Courses / Introduction to Cognitive Ergonomics in Design / Human Error and Reliability / Human Error

.

  • yohoho
  • Design Course

    Introduction to Cognitive Ergonomics in Design

    Cognitive Ergonomics in Design
    by
    Prof. Sougata Karmakar with Mr. Anirban Chowdhury
    DoD, IIT Guwahati
    Human Error
     
    • Printer-friendly version

    From the long back human errors and reliability were focused in human factors and ergonomics research to overcome human limitations by improving efficient man-machine system design. This part of this course will introduce about causes of human errors. Understanding of human errors is very crucial to the design of human-oriented products. From the traditional engineering point of view, human error is a human action/human behavior that violets system tolerance. Current approaches have defined human error as human system mismatch. Nemeth (2004) have described about three different causes of human error. According to him error can be attributed due to task complexity, error-likely situations and behavioral characteristics.

    Task complexity- “Complex task sequences can overburden short-term memory limited capacity and long-term memory recall” 

    Error-likely situations- “Situations that are poor match for human abilities, limits, experience or expectations are likely to induce errors.”

    Behavioral Characteristics- “Demographic traits, skills, training, experience, emotional state and stress factors are few of the characteristics that can induce error.”

    Human errors have been classified by several authors in different ways. Swain and Guttmann (1980) described five kinds of error depending on behaviors of omission and commission (Table 5).

     Table 5. Five types of human error, three of which can be considered to fall within errors of commission (Adapted from Swain and Guttmann, 1980)

    Omission

    Portion of a task is skipped

    Commission

    Task is performed incorrectly

    Extraneous act

    Task that should not have been performed, as it diverts attention from the system

    Sequential act

    Task is performed out of sequence

    Time error

    Task performed too early, too late, or outside of time allowed

    According to James Reason (1990), error is ‘a generic term to encompass all those occasions in which a planned sequence of mental or physical activities fails to achieve its intended outcome, when these failures cannot be attributed to the intervention of some chance agency’.  Reason correlates types of human errors with three types of human behavior which are predominated characteristics in Rasmussen’s skills-rules-knowledge model (see Table 6).

    Table 6. types of human errors based on Rasmussen’s skills-rules-knowledge model (Adapted from Reason, 1990)

    Level

    Error type

    Cognitive stage

    Failure modes

    Knowledge

    Mistakes

    Planning

    Failure of expertise, lack of expertise

    Rules

    Lapses

    Storage

    Failure of good rule application or knowledge

    Skill

    Slips

    Execution

    Failure of skill by inattention or over attention

    Donald Norman (1988) described about two kinds of human errors that are slips and mistakes. According to Norman, slips are errors that are caused by lack of attention; whereas, mistakes are errors due to conscious deliberation. Descriptions about these errors are summarized in Table 7.

    Table 7. Norman (1988) divides human error into two slips and mistakes

    Slips (automatic behavior)

    Capture errors- Frequently done activity supplants another

    Description errors- Performing correct action on wrong object triggering incorrect action

    Associative activation errors- Internal thought/ association triggers incorrect action

    Loss of activation errors- Forgetting to do something

    Mode errors- Changed meaning in the same context leads to incorrect action

    Mistakes (conscious deliberation)

    Reason (1991) describes that unsafe acts may lead to different actions and these actions may intern lead to an error. Reason’s model of psychological varieties of human error is very important for understanding how unsafe act may lead to an error. This model is presented in Figure 6.


    Figure 6. Psychological varieties of unsafe acts (Adapted from Reason, 1991)

    • Introduction
    • Human Cognitive Process and Information Processing
    • Product Emotion and Related Cognitive Theories
    • Human Error and Reliability
      • Human Error
      • Human Reliability
    • Brief Insights to Hick’s Law and Fitts’s Law
    • Basic Methods Related to Cognitive Ergonomics
    • Quiz
    • References
    • Contact Details

    Creating Digital-learning Environment for Design



    • Courses
    • Resources
    • Case study
    • Showcase
    • Tools
    • Gallery
    • Videos
    • Animation Design
    • Communication Design
    • Design Fundamentals
    • Interaction Design
    • Product Design
    • Tools for Design
    • Open Design
    • Contribute to our Dsource
    • About
    • People
    • Events
    • Job@D'source
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Download App
    • YouTube
    • Facebook
    • Twitter

    Indian Language
    English Bangali Gujarati Hindi
    Kannada Malayalam Marathi Punjabi
    Sindhi Tamil Telugu Urdu